On Thursday, September 10th I attended the MEET
Conference at the Marriott Wardman Hotel in Woodley Park. Attendees at the MEET
conference consisted of a mix of suppliers (hotels, CVBs, service vendors etc.)
and meeting planners (mix of planners from associations and government mostly).
The schedule of the MEET conference on Thursday was as follows:
- Keynote Speaker and Breakfast
- Educational Sessions
- Refreshment Break
- Education Sessions
- Networking Lunch
- Supplier Showcase (Exhibits)
I was unable to attend the keynote speaker/breakfast due to
a work obligation in the morning but arrived in time for the first series of
educational sessions. I attended the session titled “Doing the Right Thing When
No One Is Looking’ presented by Garland Preddy of the Society of Government
Meeting Professionals (SGMP). During this hour session, Garland posed several
real and theoretical dilemmas to the audience regarding ethics in the
field of event and meeting planning. For
example: A supplier (let’s assume a hotel) informs a meeting planner, that if
she books their venue for her organization’s upcoming event by the end of the
current month, the hotel will give her 50,000 personal reward points. What
should she do? What if the hotel is a valid option for the organization’s
event venue, and it was somewhat likely that the meeting planner would select
it anyway? It’s also probable that no one at the meeting planner’s organization
would need or have to know about the personal hotel points. No one would get
hurt and all parties would walk away happy. Garland argued that yes, it does
matter and crosses the ethical line. If
the organization were to somehow find out about the personal points the meeting
planner could be fired.
She also asked us to think about ‘perceptions’ when making
ethical decisions in the meeting and event planning workplace. Perceptions are
reality, and if you are perceived as guilty... For example: the government scandal
known as ‘muffingate’. A few years ago, the media got information about a
government breakfast meeting at a DC hotel in which they paid $16 for a muffin.
This caused a lot of uproar and led to the implementation of a more stringent
policy for government meeting budgets. It later was revealed that the $16 was
not just for a single muffin but for a whole breakfast package, but still to this day
many don’t know that it was proven false. Garland’s overall takeaways were:
- Be familiar with your organizations code of ethics.
- Disclose offers of gifts and incentives.
- Don’t be afraid to decline an offer of gifts or trips.
- Educate your supplier to avoid embarrassing situations.
I found this session to be the highlight of my experience at
the MEET conference and have been able to apply the takeaways to my current meeting planning position.
Oh! One last note: In the afternoon, I did some networking at the supplier
showcase and talked with several vendors including:
- Meeting Planner International (MPI): A professional association for meeting and event planners. I ended up joining as a student member then next day (and my job paid for it!).
- Visit Denver (My organization is working with them on our Annual Conference which takes place at the Denver Convention Center in May). I’m also from Denver J
- Montego Bay Convention Center (Jamaica): I learned the center is on the smaller side compared to the convention centers my organization uses for our annual conference.
- Unique venues: a cool website that helps link meeting planners to alternative meeting/event venues (outside of the typical hotel).
- A MTA alumnus! – I met Marina Soden, a 2011 MTA grad, who was nice enough to share some stories and tips about the program. She currently works as a meeting planner for a government/military organization here in DC.
No comments:
Post a Comment